I think you're right...you're one of the lucky ones.
Very lucky, I guess. The algorithm is published on the spec sheet. I can't figure out why it shouldn't pretty accurate as long as a month learning period generates a sufficient average. I have 3 displays and a bridge, and they all report within a few hundredths of an inch of each other.
It would be an interesting project for someone to to compare the absolute readings with Acurite's method and graph them over time (including the learning period) against NWS readings. The math seems very sound. It would make a great science-fair project for high-schooler.
Quote
You're right, I suppose one could go buy another unit with a different display and get a better setup. It would seem to me to cost more that way but the bigger realization here is you just made my point. The customer has to piece together the system to get it right. It shouldn't be that way. I've never had to do it before and I certainly don't think I should have to do it now. I don't see too many Davis owners or OS owners shopping around for better displays. We are all tweakers here...but the display isn't one that too many tinker with.
I don't know about that. I've heard several complaints about the Davis displays over the years, too, and the amount of stuff you have to add (like the data logger) in order to simply report to the internet. I've owned Davis (ran one for a few years, but after too much damage I finally retired it) as well as several other brands and a homebrew for over 16 years now.
Personally I find the Davis setup clunky and archaic for the price you have to pay. Just as you think Acurite needs to redesign their displays, I think Davis needs to rethink their whole philosophy using discrete data loggers and other old serial tech.
If you really want to tinker, the Acurite AcuLink system is highly hackable at very low cost. Right now I'm in the initials stages of adding a small color touch screen to the Pi system controlling my Acurite Bridge. I think that's the future of the displays rather than sticking with traditional LCDs.
Quote
I didn't intend to start anything with anyone over this. These are my observations.
Understood. I'm just trying to dispel some myths and attitudes some have about Acurite equipment. They have some issues, but they also have some very strong points. I feel Acurite is much closer to the likely future of personal weather stations than the other major vendors like Davis. Acurite's lack of development activity bothers me, though, and they could easily lose their advantage.
I'd have no qualms jumping to another vendor with the right tech at the right price.
Quote
I appreciate your point of view. I just am not quite as enthusiastic about the station as you are.....
Likewise.